BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//PALS - ECPv6.15.11//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:PALS
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://webdev.mnpals.org
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for PALS
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/Chicago
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0600
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:CDT
DTSTART:20210314T080000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0600
TZNAME:CST
DTSTART:20211107T070000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0600
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:CDT
DTSTART:20220313T080000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0600
TZNAME:CST
DTSTART:20221106T070000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0600
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:CDT
DTSTART:20230312T080000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0600
TZNAME:CST
DTSTART:20231105T070000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Chicago:20220331T130000
DTEND;TZID=America/Chicago:20220331T143000
DTSTAMP:20260505T103436
CREATED:20211007T161741Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20221010T213320Z
UID:10001133-1648731600-1648737000@webdev.mnpals.org
SUMMARY:RIPL (Reference & Instruction Discussion Group)
DESCRIPTION:Topic: The ACRL Framework for Information Literacy: Assessing its Usefulness and Impact 6 Years Later \nIt has been 8 years since the ACRL released the initial draft of the ACRL Framework in 2014 to no small amount of controversy and debate\, and 6 years since the final draft was released in 2016. While the initial controversy has died down\, recent research shows that librarian opinions about the Framework and their abilities to adapt it are still somewhat mixed. \nTo assess how the dust has settled on the initial controversy\, we’ll be reading the article Implementing the ACRL Framework: Reflections from the Field by Don Latham\, Melissa Gross\, and Heidi Julien\, and discussing how the ACRL Framework has impacted (or not impacted) our approaches to information literacy instruction\, for better or worse. If you haven’t looked at them in a while\, you can also check out The Framework for Information Literacy and ACRL’s older Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education as a comparison. \nDiscussion Question Agenda: \n\nHave you used the ACRL Framework to inform any aspect of instructional design for information literacy instruction at your library?  If you were using ACRL’s Standards for Information Literacy before\, did you switch to the Framework\, or keep using the Standards?\nIf you have used the Framework\, what aspects have you found most helpful for instructional design\, especially compared to ACRL’s older Standards for Information Literacy?  Do you have any specific instructional sessions you’ve done that you feel are especially good at teaching one or more of the frames?\nWhat aspects of the Framework have you found most difficult to adapt?  Are there any particular frames that you find troublesome?\nIf you don’t make use of the Framework for instructional design\, are there any other models of Information Literacy that you do use?  E.g. The original ACRL Standards\, the 7 Pillars\, meta-literacy approaches\, or etc.  Why do you find these models more helpful than the Framework?\nDo you have any ongoing issues or critiques with particular frames from the Framework that we haven’t touched upon yet?\n\nWe hope to see you there!
URL:https://webdev.mnpals.org/event/ripl-reference-instruction-discussion-group-2022-03-31/
LOCATION:MN\, United States
GEO:46.729553;-94.6858998
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR